so in this case, noise is because we mixed all the different cell types together and we can't tell which differential expression is from which cell type
www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/v7/n4/abs/nmeth.1439.html
Shai S Shen-Orr1,2,10, Robert Tibshirani3,4,10, Purvesh Khatri1, Dale L Bodian5,9, Frank Staedtler6, Nicholas M Perry7, Trevor Hastie3,4, Minnie M Sarwal1,2, Mark M Davis2,8,10 & Atul J Butte1,10
Abstract
We describe cell type–specific significance analysis of microarrays (csSAM) for analyzing differential gene expression for each cell type in a biological sample from microarray data and relative cell-type frequencies. First, we validated csSAM with predesigned mixtures and then applied it to whole-blood gene expression datasets from stable post-transplant kidney transplant recipients and those experiencing acute transplant rejection, which revealed hundreds of differentially expressed genes that were otherwise undetectable.
Nature Methods 7, 287 - 289 (2010)
Published online: 7 March 2010 | doi:10.1038/nmeth.1439
whole-blood cell types: lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, eosinophils and basophils
two groups: 15 acute rejection of kidney, 9 stable after kidney transplant
cell type frequencies: from Coulter counter measurements used for complete blood counts
Published online: 7 March 2010 | doi:10.1038/nmeth.1439
whole-blood cell types: lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, eosinophils and basophils
two groups: 15 acute rejection of kidney, 9 stable after kidney transplant
cell type frequencies: from Coulter counter measurements used for complete blood counts
No comments:
Post a Comment